Significant Figures and Scientific Notation
Use significant figures, scientific notation, rounding rules, and dimensional analysis to communicate quantitative results in chemistry.
A lesson of Chemistry, in Matter, Measurement, and Chemical Thinking, about 35 minutes.
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to count significant figures including the awkward zeros, apply the different rules for multiplying and adding, round correctly, and say why the rules exist at all.
Digits You Actually Measured
$$25.4 \text{ mL} \qquad \text{three significant figures}$$
Significant figures are the digits a measurement genuinely supports: the ones you read from the scale, plus the one you estimated. Writing more claims precision the instrument never had, and that is a false statement about the experiment.
Why the rules exist. A calculator dividing $10.1$ by $3$ returns $3.366666\ldots$, which asserts seven trustworthy digits from data that had three. The rules are how you stop a calculator from lying on your behalf.
The counting rules:
- All non-zero digits count. $4.72$ has three
- Zeros BETWEEN non-zeros count. $4.02$ has three
- Leading zeros never count. $0.0034$ has two, because those zeros only place the decimal point
- Trailing zeros count only if there is a decimal point. $4.50$ has three; $450$ is ambiguous and probably has two
Exact numbers have infinite significant figures and never limit a result: a count of $12$ beakers, or the $1000$ in $1$ km $= 1000$ m, are definitions rather than measurements.
Sort It: How Many Significant Figures
The Ambiguous Trailing Zero
$$450$$
Two significant figures, or three? The notation cannot say. Perhaps it was measured to the nearest ten, perhaps to the nearest one.
Scientific notation removes the ambiguity completely, which is one of its main jobs:
$$4.5 \times 10^2 \quad \text{two sig figs}$$
$$4.50 \times 10^2 \quad \text{three sig figs}$$
The exponent handles the size and the front handles the precision, so the two questions stop interfering with each other. That separation is why every scientific paper reports numbers this way.
A decimal point at the end also works in some conventions: $450.$ means three. It is easy to miss when reading, so scientific notation is the safer habit.
Example 1: Counting Them
Here is every step, worked all the way through. $$0.004070$$
<!-- SLATE_IF_STRONG: science.chemistry.matter-measurement --> <!-- END_SLATE_IF_STRONG -->